User talk:Benjamin at TeComprendo

This is Benjamin at TeComprendo's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: LOGOS Bible Video Game (June 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Alpha3031 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:LOGOS Bible Video Game and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:LOGOS Bible Video Game, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Alpha3031 (t • c) 03:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TeComprendo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Alpha3031 (t • c) 03:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:LOGOS Bible Video Game[edit]

Hello, TeComprendo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "LOGOS Bible Video Game".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:57, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles[edit]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to List of Christian video games. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:38, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: LOGOS Bible Video Game (January 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not appear to be a notable video game. Metacritic and other user reviews are unreliable and unusable to demonstrate notability as they can be easily manipulated. Reviews cannot just be from random websites but well regarded game or other journalism sites with an editorial team.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:LOGOS Bible Video Game and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:LOGOS Bible Video Game, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 19:16, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:LOGOS Bible Video Game[edit]

Hello, TeComprendo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "LOGOS Bible Video Game".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 03:45, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:LOGOS Bible Video Game[edit]

Hello, TeComprendo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "LOGOS Bible Video Game".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:18, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TeComprendo. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:LOGOS Bible Video Game, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 05:45, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Username policy[edit]

your username, "TeComprendo", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it is implying shared use. Wikipedia's policy is that usernames should not be shared between more than one individual. Usernames that are simply names of companies or groups are not permitted. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Jay (talk) 09:28, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your account was blocked because of the username concern, and not because of Conflict of Interest editing. You may continue to work on the draft Draft:LOGOS Bible Video Game to get it to the accepted article standard. Jay (talk) 12:25, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Orange Mike | Talk 16:17, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Benjamin at TeComprendo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My username implied a shared use, but I was the only person using it (Benjamin Granados), sorry for that. I've read the policies and tried to use a name according to the "Usernames implying shared use" acceptable cases.

I don't receive any compensation for the contributions I make, in fact, I don't receive anything (sometimes not even a simple "thanks") from anyone :(.

I understand the the reason of my block. I felt really bad because I've worked a lot in the article trying to be as most objective as possible, but I understand that I cannot write about it. The reason I did it was because no one takes the time to do so :(. I've asked for help but is really difficult for the people to take time to write, is really hard for me.

I didn't make it with the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anything. In fact to comply with the Wikipedia´s policies I disclose that may have a conflict of interest for the sake of the truth!, but didn't make the draft to make promotion, I did it because people asked for. In fact, a video appeared on web mentioning the draft because they're asking for such information. But I understand I have to take a lot of care with articles describing stuff I was involved with for the sake of objectiveness. :( I'm sorry.

I intend just to include an interview that was broadcasted on TV, because the people that rejected the draft is asking for "published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject", because it "does not appear to be a notable video game". Is totally independent of the subject, but I think is very difficult that someone is going to contribute to the article if I don't, even if I ask for help :( and if I don't contribute, the draft is closed after 6 months.

I feel like this is my last chance. Please please please don't let me here in the "limbo". I'm asking for your kind consideration. There are so few videogames of this category that almost no one is trying to make a difference. TeComprendo (talk) 04:51, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I will go ahead and remove the block. 331dot (talk) 11:05, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are you employed by TeComprendo? If so, you are a paid editor, you do not have to be specifically paid to edit or specifically directed to edit. Interviews are not acceptable for establishing notability, as interviews are primary sources. If you just want to tell the world about the game- which is a promotional purpose, either due to requests from users or for your own reasons, you should use social media or a website owned and operated by TeComprendo. Do you want to edit about any other topics besides this game or other products from the company? 331dot (talk) 08:09, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In fact TeComprendo is not something that pays, is an organization I made to represent, for example, the ownership of the images I uploaded to wikimedia commons. Nobody pays me anything.

And ok, if you think I can’t talk about the game for any reason I won’t. I feel tired and really unmotivated at this point.

And yeah, I want to contribute to many other christians topics out there. But I’m still learning how to edit on Wikipedia and what can be or can’t be done. The policies are inmense! TeComprendo (talk) 15:01, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TeComprendo appears to be a real-world, non-profit organization (http://tecomprendo.org/). Since you are affiliated with them, and representing their interests, you should not be creating or editing articles related to them. Editors with a conflict of interest have great difficulty writing from the required neutral point of view, and relying only on information published in reliable, independent sources. We have no interest in what an organization wants to say about itself or its products/services. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:22, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I won’t write anything about this organization (TeComprendo).

I’ll ask publicly for other editors to help complete the draft I was making according to the Wikipedia’s guidelines.

I’ll contribute in other topics that doesn’t have any relation with the organization. TeComprendo (talk) 15:44, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot, @Drm310, @Orangemike, - What are your thoughts about unblocking at this time? They've been renamed to a more appropriate username, and have agreed not to directly write about their employer any more. SQL ^{Query Me!} 19:57, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SQL: No objections from me - I'm OK with unblocking. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:03, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK with me. 331dot (talk) 20:52, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

😱 thank you thank you thank you really 😭. I thought that I was no longer going to be able to contribute to Wikipedia. I'll keep my promise. Thank you very much 🙌 Benjamin at TeComprendo (talk) 02:52, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

globally renamed TeComprendo to Benjamin at TeComprendo[edit]

globally renamed TeComprendo to Benjamin at TeComprendo Per user request --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:29, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Logos (video game) (April 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by OceanHok was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This game simply isn't notable. No reliable source has covered the game.

OceanHok (talk) 18:23, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question[edit]

Hello, Benjamin at TeComprendo! I'm SK2242. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. SK2242 (talk) 06:06, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Logos (video game) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Logos (video game). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:37, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Logos (video game)[edit]

Hello, Benjamin at TeComprendo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Logos (video game), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:04, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Logos (video game)[edit]

Hello, Benjamin at TeComprendo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Logos".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:21, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]