User talk:Usedtoknoweverything

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A welcome from Sango123[edit]

Hello, Usedtoknoweverything, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy Wiki-ing!

-- Sango123 20:55, August 20, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Nomination of Oak Park Golf Club for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oak Park Golf Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oak Park Golf Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ZimZalaBim talk 17:14, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Usedtoknoweverything! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Lunar Panoramic Photography[edit]

Do you have any non NASA sources for this? Wikipedia's notability requirements are based around third party sources. I've run across passing mentions of the concept but I don't recall third parties covering it in any depth.©Geni (talk) 16:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The NSSDCA references to Luna 9 and Chang'e 4 are simply links to concise descriptions of those missions, and the NSSDCA just happens to be NASA construct. There are numerous other references that could be used, including the relevant Wikipedia pages, but I happened to choose these.
The Apollo Lunar Surface Journal (ALSJ) is the definitive breakdown of the surface activities during those missions. Those activities are covered in lots of external sources (mission histories, astronaut biographies, etc.) but the taking of the panoramas is usually described as something like "taking a few photos" or "using the camera", which would reduce many such references to merely being trivial. In some respects, the ALSJ is a 3rd party source; yes, it's hosted by NASA, but it was conceived, created, and is maintained by a team of volunteers who are external to NASA.
And sticking to NASA resources isn't going to help much for the panoramas by the Soviet/Russian, Chinese, Indian, or Japanese probes (that is, should any be forthcoming from the Japanese one!) - other references have to be used for those.
I think you're right on the final point; I don't believe that there is a single 3rd party item that covers the concept. I think this is probably due to people overlooking the technique when they see the results... Usedtoknoweverything (talk) 12:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And I've just realised, the NSSDCA/NASA references to Luna 9 and Chang'e 4 *are* 3rd party sources! Usedtoknoweverything (talk) 16:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lunar Panoramic Photography - Apollo 14 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lunar Panoramic Photography - Apollo 14 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lunar Panoramic Photography - Apollo 14 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:40, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]