User talk:WikiEditor1234567123/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

November 2022

Hello, I'm Fuzheado. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to 2004 Nazran raid—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Fuzheado | Talk 16:15, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

List of wars involving Ingushetia moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of wars involving Ingushetia, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:43, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Which sources weren't been able to reference? I wrote the pages and names of the books made by very trusted historians like Kusheva. WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 09:23, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

New article Dzhairkhoy

Hello brother, I recently created an article about the Ingush society Dzhairkhoy, If you have interesting material related to this article, you can add them. And please, do not enter into provocations, and try not to violate the rules of Wikipedia, otherwise you may be blocked forever. Thank you for your attention! Niyskho (talk) 22:33, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

What happened to the article? WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 10:12, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Egi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Egi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:11, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khasi I, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

December 2022

Hi WikiEditor1234567123! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of 2004 Nazran raid several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:2004 Nazran raid, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:35, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on 2004 Nazran raid. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. — Wug·a·po·des​ 11:23, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

User:Wugapodes sorry for late reply but the person was very disrespectful to me, calling me vandal and using "Ingush" as a way to insult which showed his true colors. I apologize and will never attack any editors ever again. WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 16:04, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Advice.

Hello colleague, I recently joined the Wikipedia community, I have little experience in editing, I can add sources and reliable text related to the North Caucasus, especially when it comes to Ingushetia, could you give me advice on which article is best to edit? Erzi Tower (talk) 18:09, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

I really don't know which article is best for you if I don't know what you like. If you like history related then you should focus on that. Also make sure to add sources and don't violate guidelines. WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 19:39, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

I recently began to take an active interest in Wikipedia, and have already noticed contradictions in the article "Dzurdzuki", why are the sources about the Ingush removed?Erzi Tower (talk) 12:31, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Because there's some editors that remove the referenced information and I really can't do anything alone against many editors who can instantly reverse my edits. WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 13:06, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Also keep in mind that, that's not the only article that is being edited. Nazran raid article's result was always Chechen-Ingush Separatist victory but some editors try to discredit Ingush people as much as possible and remove us from the result. Vyappiy article has many lies too, it says that the Vyappiy are Chechen and Ingush society when it's only Ingush. WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 13:11, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Call the editors from the Russian Wikipedia, such as User:Adam-Yourist, he is a very experienced Ingush user (10 years of experience), explain the problem to him, information about the Ingush is massively distorted here, and this is unacceptable! Erzi Tower (talk) 13:13, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert - Eastern Europe or the Balkans

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:34, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Callanecc I don't quite understand, what is this about?

In some topics on Wikipedia that are especially contentious, there are a more stringent set of rules in place to ensure that editors are able to contribute more effectively and that Wikipedia's policies are followed. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:19, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023

Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to Nazran conflict, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:28, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Nazran conflict shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:29, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

There's individuals who keep on adding back information that doesn't belong there. I have explained to them many times but they on adding it back no matter what. Could you please revert the page back to my last edit? WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 10:37, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

See WP:WRONGVERSION. You need to use the time that the article is protected to reach a consensus on the article's talk page using the dispute resolution procedures. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:42, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Callanecc could you please return Nazran conflict to this stable version [1]? WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 13:31, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

No. You need to use the dispute resolution procedures to resolve the dispute by gaining consensus for your preferred version. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:40, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Egi has been accepted

Egi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you very much Curb Safe Charmer and Alexis.WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 20:04, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Egi

Assalamu alaikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh Goddard2000. Maybe it will be better if I wrote that Egi was a legendary figure? What do you think? WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 22:37, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Waaleikum Salam wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuhu, i personally think its best if we add him in a section of Ingush legends/folktale article instead of creating an actual article on him. Same goes for the other Chechen and Ingush folk tale heroes you created like Khasi and others who have no primary source. It sets a bad precedent to create articles based on folk tale here and there, especially if the folk tale dont have much legitimacy and are biased. Goddard2000 (talk) 16:54, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

I disagree that we shouldn't make an article for him. There exists already articles about folklore and legends so I think best is to make it clear that they are legends. There exists an article for a legendary Battle of Añyraqai, why can't Battle of the Assa River exist too? I didn't create article about Khasi and as far as I know he's not just legend but was also mentioned as Khan Khusy in Chinese sources. WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 17:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

I don't know what "Battle of Añyraqai" is and i haven't read about that battle but i know that the "battle of assa" was nothing more than a story about a skirmish between Äkkhi and Ingush, it says a lot also that you have put the Kabardins and Kumyks on a different side when in reality in the story they were mentioned on Egis side. We have no evidence of the supposed battle (skirmish) even happened, making a whole article on it is not professional. Same goes for your Nazran conflict article. Regarding Khasi yeah someone else created it my bad, i'll go over that too after i'm done with the Nazran conflict and Egi articles. No one knows if Khan Khusy truly was Khasi, this is a huge stretch. Goddard2000 (talk) 17:42, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Battle of Añyraqai was a legendary battle that exists as an article in Wikipedia. I think the best is to make clear that the battles are legendary (based on a legend).

"it says a lot also that you have put the Kabardins and Kumyks on a different side when in reality in the story they were mentioned on Egis side" well I wrote them as different side because that's what I understood from Amin Tesayev's book, it wasn't clear on who's side they were so I put them as different side. Hope you understand. WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 17:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Egi moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating Egi. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because See talk page discussion. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 07:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Adermakh moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Adermakh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). Right now, there is only a single reliable source, which does not verify the vast majority of the article. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:36, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of wars involving Ingushetia has been accepted

List of wars involving Ingushetia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ Eejit43 (talk) 03:01, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Sultan-Murza moved to draftspace

Unfortunately, an article you recently created Sultan-Murza, is not ready as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage with citations from reliable and independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. I've moved your article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:GNG guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 01:34, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ingush people, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pantheon, Karabulak and Erzi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, WikiEditor1234567123. Thank you for your work on Kistin Gorge. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for creating the article. I hope you will create more articles in the future! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:25, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

@SunDawn: Thank you. You have a blessed day too my brother! WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 06:22, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Asirko Muhamad-Ogly moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Asirko Muhamad-Ogly, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. Silikonz💬 17:28, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asirko Muhamad-Ogly (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Asirko Muhamad-Ogly and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:45, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello, WikiEditor1234567123! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:45, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Bats people

added a link pointing to Erebuni

Vyappiy

added a link pointing to Erzi

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 12:10, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Muhammad from Ingushetia

Do you know history? Dadaev wrote about him. There is information that it was a Chechen theologian once in one village, now it was a village in Ingushetia. Therefore, Dadaev called him from Ingushetia. He did not write about his nationality. Takhirgeran Umar (talk) 14:55, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

What do you mean by "do you know history"? Which information says that it was Chechen theologian? WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 15:28, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

This is new data. Dagestan historians will publish. I would not write about one Nabe, this is a drop in the sea. Still read the article naib, in Ingushetia they do not quite understand what it is. Of course, I understand a great interest in the imamat recently in Ingushetia. Takhirgeran Umar (talk) 15:42, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

You forgot to answer me — which information says that Muhammed from Ingushetia was Chechen theologian? Also I quite don't understand your point (which may be due to your obvious usage of translator software). So Dagestani historians are lying and Ingush don't know anything about naibs? WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 15:52, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Ingush people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Avenger.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Friendly advice

Just a note, when discussing the behavior of sockpuppets, Wikipedia:Don't stuff beans up your nose#Modern essay usage. Ideally, if they're going to keep sockpuppeting, we want them to make the same mistakes again so that they get caught. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

If I understood correctly your advice, I shouldn't tell people not to do something, correct? WikiEditor1234567123 (talk)

The recommendation is that you shouldn't explain to sockpuppets how they got caught for sockpuppetry. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:27, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Rosguill this is unrelated to the advice but it's been a week and Reiner hasn't replied in Talk:Fyappiy. Do I have to wait for that long or is it allowed for me to edit the page? To me it looks like Reiner no longer is active in Wikipedia. WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 11:07, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

I think once you've waited a full week without response you've done due diligence and can proceed with your edit. Ideally, leave a comment in the discussion thread explaining that you waited for a week and will bee moving forward now, etc. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:27, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Okay now that it's been week I will proceed editing the page. Thank you. WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 15:36, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Rosguill could you please rename Vyappiy as Fyappiy? I will then remake the redirect page (Vyappiy) as an article about the clan Vyappiy that lives in Dagestan. So basically there will be separate articles about the society (Fyappiy) and the clan (Vyappiy, which originates from Fyappiy). I hope this doesn't sound confusing for you. WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 15:45, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

I think that Reiner won't have any issues with this because it's a good solution to the dispute that we had. WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 15:46, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

I'd rather see this go through WP:RM, as you're proposing a change to article content that has not been discussed and endorsed by community consensus yet. It also sounds a bit like you're proposing WP:POVFORKs; depending on how sources actually discuss the topic, it may not be appropriate from an encyclopedic perspective even if it would "solve" the conflict between you and Reiner. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:59, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Perhaps, if separation of the article cannot be done, then the clan Vyappiy can be briefly mentioned in a section of the article? Could this be the solution? WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 16:05, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

It should follow the balance of sources. Do any of the sources describe both subjects as different groups? Or otherwise discuss them in a way that it is obvious that these are not the same group? _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:10, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

The Fyappiy is a large society with many teips (clans) and surnames which was formed and located in mountainous Ingushetia. Some of the Fyappins left the Ingushetia and migrated to Georgia giving start to Bats people, while some lesser amount of Fyappiy from the Torshkhoy teip (clan) migrated to Aukh, a region in today's Dagestan giving start to the modern day Chechen teip (meaning clan). To me it's obvious that we have to differentiate these two, Fyappiy is a big Ingush society with many clans and surnames in Ingushetia, while the other is offspring of the society but today a clan in Dagestan bearing the name Vyappiy. If we would separate these two then there wouldn't be any confusions. WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 16:22, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

You have to understand that these two are not quite the same thing, one is society with many clans in Ingushetia and the other is clan in Dagestan despite coming from the society long time ago. WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 16:28, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Assuming that reliable sources generally agree about that distinction, then it depends of the degree of coverage of the Dagestan clan. If there's multiple reliable sources that examine the Dagestan clan in specific detail, then splitting makes sense. If the Dagestan clan is mentioned only in passing in the context of the Ingush society, it should get a section in the article about the Ingush group. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:38, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

For now I just shortly mentioned them in a section "Aukh Vyappins". If I want for this article to be renamed as Fyappiy, where do I have to suggest this? WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 17:05, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Follow the instructions at WP:PCM _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:07, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arshty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nain.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Fortanga is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 15:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 15:52, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zelimkhan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shali.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Since you filed a complaint, then I did the same

you know that in the official language Vladikavkaz has two statuses in Russian and Ossetian. it's simple, you shouldn't get involved in it. Elbrusoid1507 (talk) 18:38, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Enlighten me please, what do you mean by I "shouldn't get involved in it"? Wikipedia is welcome for everybody to edit and make good contribution to it. WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 19:24, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Orstkhoy

Just saw your edit, what about we agree to put pro-Chechen sources in Chechen section and pro-Ingush sources in Ingush section, no need to retort with "But they disagree" text on the Berger source in Chechen section otherwise the same can be done on the "Military Statistical Review of the Russian Empire // Caucasian Territory, 1851" source in the Ingush section. In my opinion either we remove the quotes and just have the sources included saying "this person said Orstkhoi belong to this nation" or we post a retort on both quotes like you did in Chechen section. Goddard2000 (talk) 01:14, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

I put 3 secondary sources regarding Berge and I don't understand for what reason you removed them, explain yourself please. Also explain what can be done to "Military Statistical Review of the Russian Empire // Caucasian Territory, 1851"? WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 06:41, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

I don't think you understood what i meant but no matter, we can leave it for another day. Goddard2000 (talk) 14:10, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Dispute resolution

Assalam Aleykum, since it is Ramadan and both of us don't want to argue and potentially do pitan during this month i have decided to create a post on the dispute resolution board and tagged you (since the argument was mainly between us). This argument all boils down to which source is the oldest, we need to involve a third party that will look through both sources. So for now lets leave other disputes behind us and only focus on the chronology of the 2 sources. Goddard2000 (talk) 14:18, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Undefined sfn reference

Hi in this edit to Galashkinskoe Naibstvo you introduced a reference to "Доклад о границах и территории Ингушетии 2021" which you did not define. This means that nobody can look the reference up, and also adds the article to Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. If you could fix this that would be great. DuncanHill (talk) 03:33, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Galashians

Hi WikiEditor1234567123. Can I suggest you that if you are going to be using short form references (for instance {{sfn}}) the you should turn on the associated error messages. You can find the details here Category:Harv and Sfn template errors. You've added the reference "Берже 1859" to Galashians, but no such work is defined in the article. Could you add the required cite to the Bibliography section, or let me know what work this refers to? -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 11:52, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

WikiEditor1234567123 Can you please check the Galashian talk page, i'm not sure if i tagged you correctly in there. Goddard2000 (talk) 01:59, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Dzherakh

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Dzherakh, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:33, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Khamkhins

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Khamkhins, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:31, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Ingushetia into Ingush people. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:43, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Bamut

Hi again WikiEditor1234567123. Sorry there's another missing cite, this time at the Bamut article. You've added a reference for "Доклад о границах и территории Ингушетии 2021" but no such work is defined in the article. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 22:11, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

No problem, added the missing cite. Thank you for letting me know. WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 22:19, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

There's no more missing at Fyappiy, "Терская область. Списокъ населенныхъ мѣстъ по ​свѣдѣніямъ​ 1874 года 1878" and "Списокъ населенныхъ мѣстъ Терской области: (По даннымъ къ 1-​му​ іюля 1914 года) 1915" -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 22:44, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sulumbek of Sagopshi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Koki.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:42, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Zaur (village)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Zaur (village), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:14, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Zaur (village)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Zaur (village), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:14, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Vladikavkaz

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Vladikavkaz, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can (bot)&section=new report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:04, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ola Tønningsberg (talk) 00:09, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Fyappiy

added a link pointing to Garak

Ingushskiy Okrug

added a link pointing to Khay

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ola Tønningsberg (talk) 16:11, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ola Tønningsberg (talk) 16:56, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Akhmed Khuchbarov

added a link pointing to Guli

Egikal

added a link pointing to Guli

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Ingush people

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ingush people, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:36, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Chakh Akhriev

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Chakh Akhriev, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:09, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Akhmed Khuchbarov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guli.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Orstkhoy

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Orstkhoy, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:10, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Battle of the Assa River

Draft:Battle of the Assa River, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Battle of the Assa River and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Battle of the Assa River during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. TartarTorte 18:24, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fyappiy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guli.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Pre-reform orthography in notes

Hey, WikiEditor1234567123, I hope you're well. I recently discovered a novel and clean way to write the pre-reform/revolution Russian orthography variants of uezd and okrug names in the translation note – I've done it in the Nazranovskiy Okrug article. I'll demonstrate how it should look:

Code:

{{efn|{{bulletedlist|{{lang-ru|Назрано́вский о́круг}}, {{lang-ru|label=<small>[[pre-reform orthography]]</small>|Назрано́вскій о́кругъ|translit=Nazranovskiy okrug}}|{{lang-inh|Наьсарен округ|Näsaren okrug}}}}}}

Appears in the note as:

• Russian: Назрано́вский о́круг, pre-reform orthography: Назрано́вскій о́кругъ, romanized: Nazranovskiy okrug
• Ingush: Наьсарен округ, romanized: Näsaren okrug

The only concern is that there seems to be a consensus forming against using Russian vowel emphasis/pronunciation diacritics on EnWiki, what are your thoughts?

In any case, I was wondering if I could count on your help on implementing this new way of expressing the pre-reform orthography and implementing modern Russian elsewhere (such as in infoboxes and tables) for these historical uezd/okrug/oblast articles? Best, – Olympian ^loquere 23:26, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello. Thanks for asking. I'm fine. How are you? I'm not familiar with the "consensus forming against using Russian vowel emphasis/pronunciation diacritics" in English Wikipedia, could you please enlighten me in this topic? Either way, you can count my help in, just enlist me all the articles that need to be fixed and when I have time I will try my best to fix atleast some of them. Since I will offer my help, could you also help me out and take a look at Fyappiy? An article about an Ingush subgroup, which I currently think of making a "good article". Since you have some experience with making good articles, please take a look and improve somehow the article even by little things such as fixing typos, thank you. WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 23:47, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! I'd be delighted to review Fyappiy and help it gain GA status! Regarding the vowel emphasis diacritics, I'll have to search for it as I saw it weeks ago, but I'm certain it exists in some discussion. The ~50 articles that need fixing with this new pre-reform orthography note are the uezds, okrugs, governorates, oblasts, and otdels of the Caucasus Viceroyalty (1801–1917), and eventually the ones across modern-day Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus (though we can deal with those later). Best, – Olympian ^loquere 00:26, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Request_concerning_WikiEditor1234567123 Goddard2000 (talk) 02:41, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 10

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Battle of Khachara (1667)

added a link pointing to Turkic

Ruslan Mamilov

added a link pointing to Ordzhonikidze

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Regarding Orstkhoy

Assalamu Alaykum i just noticed your arbitration response regarding my Orstkhoy comment, i don't think its anything bad to add information about intra-tribal conflicts to the article but the conflicts were more than just "In the 1780s, during the Movement of Sheikh Mansur, Orstkhoy were regularly subject to Chechen raids as can be attested by many reports and documents.". There are several reports of Karabulaks (Orstkhoy) joining Sheikh Mansur and even sending people to him, there are secondary sources that evaluate the relationships between Karabulaks and Mansur which show that it was more than just regular raids. Leaving that part aside though i think you missed my point, i have noticed a trend of you including darker moments in Chechen-Karabulak history but not Ingush, not only that but as i pointed out you have a history of white washing Ingush-Karabulak history by removing the fact that Ingush signed a treaty with Russia to specifically fight Karabulaks in 1810. You claim now that it was an accident, but it seems strange to me that you haven't added this important moment in Karabulak history to the Orstkhoy article, it kind of proves my point don't you think? i mean you have had hours to add that bit to the "Contacts with Russian Empire" section but it is nowhere to be seen. Seems at the moment at least to me that you prefer adding Chechen-Karabulak conflicts instead.

As for my 3 year old edit in "Aukh" that you brought up, i don't like to go that far back in history as everyone makes mistakes but i see nothing wrong in writing Chechen and not including Ingush in that section when it comes to teips that are Chechen (doesn't make them non-Ingush though) in an article about Chechens. I don't have a problem with you adding Ingush to that sentence though, just figured i should comment on it and clarify that it wasn't meant as an anti-Ingush edit or anything like that. Goddard2000 (talk) 18:54, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Wa alaykum assalam. Ingush didn't sign the treaty with Russia to specifically fight Karabulaks in 1810. The treaty only mentions that Ingush will have to fight off Russian enemies, namely the Chechens and Karabulaks. I don't see how 1810 treaty is an important moment that should be mentioned when even after this treaty, Ingush-Karabulak relations remained the same and the treaty didn't change the relations in anyway. Fargieva village (Karabulak village) even made a treaty with Russia in 1811 based "on the basis of duty made by the Ingush". In 1780s during the Sheikh Mansur raids, Ingush and Karabulaks sometimes even collaborated and made raids together on Chechen settlemens as a revenge which shows that they were in good relations. Btw you mentioned that there's reports of Karabulaks joining Mansur and so on, I'm not against you adding this. Really, if you have RS regarding this, then add them. For example according to Umalat Laudayev, Ingush (who were also subject to raids) actually joined Sheikh Mansur and converted to Islam. Overall, I would appreciate if you wouldn't accuse me of trying to Ingushify history or white-wash Ingush history, sounds nothing more than a personal attack. I'm not accusing you either of similar acts so do me a favor and refrain from such drastic accusations. Thank you. WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 19:32, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Ingush (or rather the Nazranians) signed a treaty with Russia where they promised to provide 1000 men to fight both Chechens and Karabulaks, after they ambushed a detachment of Karabulaks and Chechens killing many of them. This is the reason for the treaty and why Ingush joined because they feared retaliation, don't you think this is important to mention? I mean you have the dates 1807 and then a gap then 1825 in the article but no mention of 1810? Here is a report from Graf Ivelich on 1810 9th June:

"At the request of everything, this date, the peaceful Ingush foremen came to my fortress, from whom the amanats are kept, with a report on what was done during the battle against the Chechen and Karabulak parties, consisting of up to 600 people, of which the leader of the prince was killed by them . Albaksid Kanchokin and bridle him, chief rider of predatory parties, Elzheruko Abaev,Yes, there are 51 Chechens and Karabulakovs, and it is not known about the wounded who fled in the forest; 23 were taken into the plan. In total, damage from the predatory side of the Chechen and Karabulak 76 people, up to 100 healthy and wounded horses, about which incident c. above, before this, it was briefly reported from me. At what a long time I put to add the request of the above-mentioned Ingush elders and their entire village, stretching more than 7,000 souls, who, due to their disastrous condition, were forced to move to the river for arable farming. Sunzhu with the return of amanats to the Kabardian prince. Bako Zhambotov,with the return from each yard a ruble ser. and 2 measurements of millet; in addition to this situation, they were forced to accept their amanats from the Chechen predators with giving the same tax to the Chechens and their mullahs, who converted them to the Muhammadan faith and made a mosque where the Ingush went to learn the faith, which served for a while in favor of the predators. But many Ingush, and especially those who were kindly treated by me, often secretly

I don't know about you but this seems like a major event, should we not add the fact that an allied Chechen-Karabulak detachment coming after a raid on Vladikavkaz was ambushed by Ingush who then joined Russia due to fear of retaliation? I don't think 1 Karabulak village joining Russia in 1811 matters when a year prior the Karabulaks in an alliance with Chechens were killed during an Ingush ambush. The source is here and it contains the letter + the original source.

The 1780's raids i need to find primary sources as i only have secondary sources but i could elaborate some more on that sentence which implies there were just raids. As for the Laudaev saying Ingush joined Sheikh Mansur, learning about things like this only makes me happier and i think we should highlight these parts of our history on Wikipedia. The accusations of "white-washing" might've been too harsh, i didn't personally mean for it to be a personal attack. I'll leave these terms aside then to keep it more civil. Goddard2000 (talk) 20:21, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Although I couldn't find that online version of that book, found the report in the book "Акты Кавказской археологической комиссии об Ингушетии и ингушах" (pp. 74–75). Nevertheless, the battle isn't that of notable to be added into the article compared to numerous raids of Sheikh Mansur. If I then add Battle of Churuch-Arshty where Cossack-Chechen forces under Gen. Grekov destroyed the village and killed the Karabulaks, then the history section would be filled with unnecessary battles taking up space, you get me? If you want to make due weight of the Sheikh Mansur raids, you could add the reports of Karabulaks joining the movement, okay? Also once again, the Karabulak village made oath for Russia in 1811 on the basis of duty made by Nazranians in 1810. In other words, that they too will fight off "Russia's enemies". WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 20:59, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

I agree that random raids and battles of no importance shouldn't be included but the 1810 battle was notable and had major repercussions as we can tell from the oath of 6 Ingush clans. You mentioned Russians building a fort for Ossetians and Karabulaks in 1782 due to mountain Chechen raids, as if this is more notable than 1810 which caused Nazran to become a major Russian fort. So far i'm not impressed with the history section, and in my opinion if Chechen-Karabulak conflicts are highlighted then we should do the same to Ingush-Karabulak conflicts. We can discuss some more on this topic later when i have more time. Goddard2000 (talk) 21:26, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tashaw-Hadji, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capital.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Regarding_Wikieditor1234567123 Landkomtur (talk) 21:14, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, WikiEditor1234567123. Thank you for your work on Nureddin Akhriev. User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Needs a further reading section with unused bib entries.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creepTalk 19:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Batal Hajji Belkhoroev

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Batal Hajji Belkhoroev you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 07:02, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Batal Hajji Belkhoroev

The article Batal Hajji Belkhoroev you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Batal Hajji Belkhoroev and Talk:Batal Hajji Belkhoroev/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:22, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Batal Hajji Belkhoroev

The article Batal Hajji Belkhoroev you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Batal Hajji Belkhoroev for comments about the article, and Talk:Batal Hajji Belkhoroev/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 20:21, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Galashki (2002), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edwardsville.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Ingush people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orientalist.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chakh Akhriev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ordzhonikidze.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on East Prigorodny conflict

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page East Prigorodny conflict, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:49, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chechen-Aul, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Argun River.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Edit page

WikiEditor1234567123 Ассалам Алейкум can you look at the article? Bersa Sheikh, Берса-Шейх In the Russian section it is there, if something unnecessary remove it. Товболатов (talk) 05:57, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Ва алейкум ассалам. Быстро прошёлся по преамбуле и чуть-чуть исправил, по позже ещё взгляну на статью (грамматика в статье вроде хромает). Насчёт тайпов, думаю нет смысла это указывать в преамбуле, вот например в хорошей статье про Батал-Хаджи Белхароева, принадлежность Батал-Хаджи к Белхарой я указал в разделе «Background». Также, если у тебя конечно есть время для этого, советую использовать вот этот шаблон «Template:Tree chart» для указания семейного древа Берса-Шейха. Бери пример с раздела «Background» статьи Nureddin Akhriev. С уважением, WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 08:25, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Насчет источников: старайся не использовать газету в качестве источника для столь исторического личности. Думаю у историков Шарпудина Ахмадова, Явуза Ахмадова или Шахрудина Гапурова есть что-то про Берса-Шейха, попытайся использовать таких рода АИ. С уважением, WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 08:52, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Дела реза хьула. Автор статьи в русской не я, до меня ее кто то создал, потом разные авторы редактировали. Источник из газеты Теркйист давно добавили туда. Да нужно поискать исходники по Берса Шейху он был проповедником и возглавлял Нохч-Мохк в тот период (стилевые правки нужно сделать). По родословной есть фотография (1) можно в галерею добавить. Когда время у тебя будет сихо яц. Я посмоторел у Nureddin Akhriev да хорошая статья и оформление. Дала тъяхе бяркате йойла. Товболатов (talk) 12:07, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Хьонаъ Даьла раьза хийла. Про то что Берса-Шейх был проповедником пишет Я. З. Ахмадов, собираюсь добавить этот источник в скором времени. Однако, я считаю что Тесаева надо убрать и заменить на того же Ахмадова. Он не серьезный АИ как по мне — зачастую фольклор выдает как за исторический факт. С уважением, WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 14:53, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

В этом источнике несколько авторов, видимо из их книги. 1. Источник: Айтберов Т. М., Хапизов Ш. М. Эпиграфические источники по истории распространения ислама в Чечне (XVI XIX вв.) // Известия СОИГСИ. 2016. Вып. 20 (59). С.15—24. По ссылке там в конце все источники отмечены. Посмотрю еще если найду скину тебе.--Товболатов (talk) 17:00, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nazran uprising, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ordzhonikidze.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nazran uprising

The article Nazran uprising you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Nazran uprising for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jalapeño -- Jalapeño (talk) 11:22, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fyappiy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Erzi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maghas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brill.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cite Ingush-Russian Dictionary 1927

Template:Cite Ingush-Russian Dictionary 1927 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:11, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cite Russian-Ingush Dictionary 1980

Template:Cite Russian-Ingush Dictionary 1980 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:11, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Nazran uprising

Thanks a lot! Could you take a look at Fyappiy or Chakh Akhriev some day? Best regards, WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 17:51, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

No worries; I don't take on direct c/e requests but if you add them to the Requests page I might get them sometime. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 03:59, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Chakh Akhriev

Hi WikiEditor1234567123, I've done my best to c/e this article but I found a few bits of text I couldn't understand, mostly in the section "Later life". I've marked these with [clarification needed] tags; these terms are "he worked as a candidate for office position" and "he worked as an official on special assignments to supervise the populated lands and quitrent articles". I've bolded the actual confusing terms. Anyway, good luck with your planned GA nomination. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 08:22, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sulumbek of Sagopshi

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sulumbek of Sagopshi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Geardona -- Geardona (talk) 19:42, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Sulumbek of Sagopshi

Good luck on your GA request, I did a review myself, see my review above. May I also suggest you archive some of your talk page. Geardona (talk) 19:49, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fyappiy

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fyappiy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RoySmith -- RoySmith (talk) 17:21, 25 December 2023 (UTC)