Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Blue-tailed damselfly

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2016 at 13:30:25 (UTC)

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:30, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I don't see this image in Blue-tailed damselfly. —Bruce1ee^talk 13:39, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry — @Bruce1ee: - added now. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:53, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - I still don't see it; Blue-tailed damselfly hasn't been changed since July 2016. —Bruce1ee^talk 14:35, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    - Sorry again — @Bruce1ee:. I thought you meant in Commons. Definitely there now. Promise :) 22:22, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      - Support. Thanks. The DoF is a little shallow (the far legs are out-of-focus), but it's still very nice, and I like the bokeh. —Bruce1ee^talk 04:59, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jobas (talk) 09:11, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose. It's a strong photo, but it's currently only used in a gallery in (what looks like) an over-illustrated article. Josh Milburn (talk) 21:17, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support MITB --- MITB_talk 14:08, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose - Limited EV (not in lead image, buried in gallery), shows only one gender when there is sexual dimorphism. Mattximus (talk) 17:29, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:31, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]