Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 February 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< January 31 << Jan | February | Mar >> February 2 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


February 1[edit]

01:54:37, 1 February 2018 review of submission by WidgetFan1234[edit]


WidgetFan1234 (talk) 01:54, 1 February 2018 (UTC) Why was my Typical Gamer Draft deleted, should i get help and guidance, it did have sources![reply]

Hello again WidgetFan1234. Draft:Typical Gamer is not deleted. In November it was declined for publication for the reasons explained:
  1. on the draft
  2. on your talk page
  3. in response to your question here, and
  4. in response to your question at the Teachouse.
The draft cites no reliable sources (famousbirthdays.com and youtube.com are not reliable sources) and provides no evidence that the subject meets Wikipedia's inclusion criteria. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:48, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 03:24:54, 1 February 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Shereenlavi[edit]


The National Basketball League of Canada needs to be added to the list of Basketball Leagues that are notable. The league has added a team and the talent of the players and coaches are much higher this season.v ---- Shereen Lavi

Shereenlavi (talk) 03:24, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shereenlavi. The place to propose a change to WP:NBASKETBALL is Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports). --Worldbruce (talk) 15:51, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

03:32:15, 1 February 2018 review of submission by Mudhabdeb[edit]


I am trying to publish a wikipedia page to inform people about a specific topic. This topic has very few sources that reference it in detail. As a result of this, the majority of the information available about this topic comes from a primary source that is not independent of the topic. While this may not be ideal for references on wikipedia it makes in difficult to write a detailed yet understandable explanation of the topic that is being described in the article I am writing. I think that wikipedia is an ideal platform to use in the case to spread information about this topic to a general population. However, in the current state I am unsure of how to better reference the subject I am writing about based on wikipedias guidelines.

Mudhabdeb (talk) 03:32, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mudhabdeb. In your own words, you admit that "This topic has very few sources that reference it in detail." You have put forward a very powerful argument that Wikipedia should not have an article about this topic at this time. I suggest that you work on articles about other topics instead. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

05:20:20, 1 February 2018 review of submission by Harsh1070[edit]

Hello KJP1,I have created article for Kohinoor Group.But it gets rejected.I want to know the exact reason for rejection. Kohinoor Group is an well established organization.I have mention all the information of this organization along with references.Also i want to mention that this article does not contain any advertisement content.If you think that this article contains any advertisement content then please mention where i have advertise. Harsh1070 (talk) 05:20, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Harsh1070. This sentence is overtly promotional: "The company is among Pune’s top real estate companies known for its commercial and residential properties." The overall tone of the draft is promotional. The quality of the prose is poor, as is your command of the English language. Sorry. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:35, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As your are saying that this sentence is promorional.("The company is among Pune’s top real estate companies known for its commercial and residential properties.") but I have mention reference for it. the nrinews24x7.com has published that information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harsh1070 (talkcontribs) 05:45, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]