Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 September 12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< September 11 << Aug | September | Oct >> September 13 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


September 12[edit]

00:28:36, 12 September 2019 review of submission by Oneonta1776[edit]


Thank you for the feedback. I understand the comment to include this information in the entry on Yohanan Petrovsky Shtern. However, when I originally did that, several weeks ago, my efforts were repeatedly erased by someone who I think must be a troll of some sorts because no credible answer was given for erasing the information, which is well substantiated by independent sources. Can you help please? Yes, I'd like to enter this information in that entry for Yohanan Petrovsky Shtern. Thank you.

Oneonta1776 (talk) 00:28, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold pending disclosure of use of multiple accounts, see User talk:Oneonta1776#One person, one account. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:19, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

06:26:43, 12 September 2019 review of submission by Chirag-Behre[edit]

We have made minor tweaks in the content. Kindly please review the same. Chirag-Behre (talk) 06:26, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Chirag-Behre: - the article was rejected for not showing notability - just editing the content will never demonstrate it. It's only worth asking if you find at least 2 good reliable, independent, in-depth secondary sources. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:21, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

06:44:00, 12 September 2019 review of submission by Ken9991032[edit]

Hi I am a new editor of Wiki. For this case, I would like to know how to improve the skills of editing Wiki. Would you mind to give me some suggestion on it. Thank you very much.

Ken9991032 (talk) 06:44, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ken9991032: - The wikipedia adventure is an interactive tutorial that's quite good at getting the basics along. You should also read WP:NOTPROMO, as your draft would need a major rewrite to be more suitable. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:23, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:17:30, 12 September 2019 review of submission by Ahmedpgp75[edit]


Ahmedpgp75 (talk) 08:17, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ahmedpgp75: - I answered what I felt was your most likely issue several days ago (about half a page up) Nosebagbear (talk) 10:25, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:24:34, 12 September 2019 review of submission by Bethany m m[edit]


Hi, I have removed links that did not comply, please can I re-submit for publication? Thanks

Bethany m m (talk) 11:24, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold pending paid editing disclosure, see User talk:Bethany m m#Violation of terms of use. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:14, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:04:56, 12 September 2019 review of draft by Mj4841[edit]


I need to address my reasons for writing a blog entry, specifically to clarify that I am unpaid. Where can I make such a statement? By the way, here's what I plan to state: "I'm a writer involved in the health insurance industry, but am not being paid for my Wiki article and I am not affiliated with healthinsurance.org or their partners. Is there somewhere I can note this formally?"

Mj4841 (talk) 13:04, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mj4841: The best place to state this is on your user page. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:14, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:48:53, 12 September 2019 review of submission by JuntasCambiamos[edit]


Hi, my question actually is just about asking if there is a way for the article draft that I submitted to not be up for revision by AcF anymore, since I already discovered that it will be denied due to like of notability that i can find to use as references.

JuntasCambiamos (talk) 14:48, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JuntasCambiamos. If you would like Draft:Goleadoras to be deleted, add {{db-g7}} to the top of it. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:30, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:43:58, 12 September 2019 review of submission by MacOS Master[edit]


Because International has developed several notable, unique technologies used in products like The Shoe That Grows and Bednet Buddy. I believe that (especially with my revisions) this page meets notability standards due to heavy coverage of the company by media and deserves to be added to Wikipedia. Thank you!

MacOS Master (talk) 15:43, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:50:46, 12 September 2019 review of submission by Lullabying[edit]


I would like to get assistance in improving this article and bringing it up to Wikipedia standards. The topic received coverage over multiple news sources and has become a (morally questionable) Internet meme similar to the Sasebo slashing. lullabying (talk) 15:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

lullabying (talk) 15:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lullabying. Because of the nature of Articles for Creation, you are unlikely to find the assistance you desire here. You could try soliciting collaborators at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Japan and/or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Internet culture.
The draft relies heavily on stories in Tokyo Reporter, a tabloid. Such newspapers have a poor reputation for reliability (see Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources) and WP:TABLOID is a redirect to Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Editor interest in the topic may be lukewarm unless stronger sources can be found that more convincingly demonstrate that the event had a significant lasting effect. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:27, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:56:17, 12 September 2019 review of submission by Mjl2012[edit]


Mjl2012 (talk) 15:56, 12 September 2019 (UTC) Hi, I'm just trying to understand why edits I made to a page of an author were't accepted. I got the information from the website and from reading their books and hearing them speak. The answer I received was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.[reply]

Hi Mjl2012. User:Mjl2012/sandbox is not suitable for publication as an encyclopedia article. Wikipedia already has three articles relevant to it: Ellen Fein, Sherrie Schneider, and The Rules. If the sentence in your sandbox is something you want to add to one of those articles, be bold and insert it, unless you've already tried to do so and been reverted, in which case you should discuss it on the article's talk page. Keep in mind that just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean it belongs in an encyclopedia. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:52, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:25:43, 12 September 2019 review of submission by Farzanfa007[edit]

we are fan club of kerala blasters FC from Kerala, India . what we want to do to get approval Farzan F A 16:25, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi Farzanfa007. Please clarify what you mean by "we". The policy on Wikipedia is "one user—one account". Usernames should not be shared by multiple individuals. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:19, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:15:03, 12 September 2019 review of submission by Mdmisri[edit]


Mdmisri (talk) 17:15, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:02:27, 12 September 2019 review of submission by Rbiddis1[edit]


Not sure if my previous request got lost? I don't see it on my page at all. Anyway, I have re-written the article to be specifically about Troublemaker (band). I have also found several more references for notability. How should I go about resubmitting my Wiki Article for review?

Thanks for all the help. I know you guys work hard on here.

Rbiddis1 (talk) 18:02, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rbiddis1: Your previous post, and the answer to it, are at #13:02:56, 10 September 2019 review of submission by Rbiddis1. The thread will be archived after seven days. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:22, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19:49:54, 12 September 2019 review of submission by Fizzylytics[edit]

We have submitted the page with necessary changes after our first attempt. It would be helpful if you guys can review the page as soon as possible. Fizzylytics (talk) 19:49, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Who is "we" Wikipedia accounts are strictly for single person use. Please be sure to declare any conflict of interest. Theroadislong (talk) 19:58, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

20:53:47, 12 September 2019 review of submission by Trubadur[edit]


Trubadur (talk) 20:53, 12 September 2019 (UTC) I have added a lot of reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject.[reply]

Hi Trubadur. None of the added sources: phenomenon.hu, Heavy Blog Is Heavy, Score AV, Captured Howls, and keretblog.hu appear to be reliable for the purpose of demonstrating notability. If you think I am mistaken, you are welcome to seek advice at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard as to whether they are reliable for that purpose. Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources lists some sources Wikipedians have found useful in writing about albums and musicians. You could also search them, or wait until after the band's album is released, at which time more might be written about them. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:54, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

22:37:31, 12 September 2019 review of submission by Kavabata007[edit]

Hello, how can improve the article so it could be posted? What is missing, maybe you can give me some advice, because I'm not a "PRO" writer. Thank in advance. Kavabata007 (talk) 22:37, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kavabata007. No amount of editing will make the topic suitable for publication here. Considering Wikipedia's general sanctions on blockchain and cryptocurrency-related articles, you may wish to explore alternative outlets for your writing. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:01, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

23:17:37, 12 September 2019 review of draft by Tylerjray[edit]


I want to create a wikipedia article for a professional athlete, Allison Wieseler. I believe I submitted an article but for the user sandbox, which i believe to be the wrong place to submit. How do i publish a page for an article? Tylerjray (talk) 23:17, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Tylerjray: No, that draft is in one of the possible locations for submissions. The reviewer left a note for you on the draft. Make sure you read it before resubmit. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 04:40, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]