Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 September 10

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< September 9 << Aug | September | Oct >> September 11 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


September 10[edit]

07:54:34, 10 September 2020 review of submission by Saskia Schuldig[edit]


Saskia Schuldig (talk) 07:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Hi there,

I have added a few external resources to the article to provide more notability and rapport.

Please review and let me know what needs work

Thanks, S Saskia Schuldig (talk) 07:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Saskia Schuldig Your draft has been rejected, meaning it will not be considered further, as it appears your company does not meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. Your sources seem to be routine business announcements, and not the significant coverage in independent reliable sources needed. An article about a company must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a company, showing how it meets the definition of a notable company. "Significant coverage" does not include press releases, announcements of routine business transactions, staff interviews, or primary sources. Not every company merits an article here, even within the same field. Feel free to show your superiors this message. Note that since you say on your user page that you are editing as part of your job duties, you are a paid editor even if you are not given specific compensation for your edits. 331dot (talk) 09:01, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

08:14:46, 10 September 2020 review of submission by SriSuryaBharadwaj[edit]

She is well known in India and she is from Seeleru village. She is one of the daughter of "Shri Shirdi Sai Baba". You can search with the name Sri Shirdi Sai Baba in google to know about. This article is very important for the presentation purpose.

SriSuryaBharadwaj (talk) 08:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SriSuryaBharadwaj Your draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. It is completely unsourced and does not indicate how this person meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable person, as shown with significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Please see Your First Article for more information. 331dot (talk) 08:58, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

08:16:12, 10 September 2020 review of submission by Enkyflex[edit]

That article based on a musical artist, He's a great rapper in his country and he got big impact. He's an influencer of New generation rap and he deserves to be written on Wikipedia's article. If there's any mistake we're doing on creating, let's know what is wrong so that we can correct them.

Enkyflex (talk) 08:16, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Enkyflex Who is "we"? Each account is for the exclusive use of a single individual. Your draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. It appears that this musician does not meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable musician, as shown with significant coverage in independent reliable sources. 331dot (talk) 08:56, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 10:47:01, 10 September 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Rashid Jorvee[edit]


I need to create an article on Indian Islamic culture center which is located in New Delhi. I have done little work and drafted and submitted for review long back, but that article doesn't fulfilling all the criteria of wikipedia, hence didnt get approved. Could some please help me to complete this article. or anyone from Wikimedia India jump and takeover on this article please.

Thank you!! Rashid Jorvee (talk) 10:47, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rashid Jorvee (talk) 10:47, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rashid Jorvee Why do you "need" to do this? Very few people "need" to edit. You can request that the text be retrieved at WP:REFUND. 331dot (talk) 10:49, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
331dot, I already requested to restore the draft version of article. This is a Islamic center in India, and I thing information and detail article about this center should be on Wikipedia. That's why I would like to create an article on it. Rashid Jorvee (talk) 10:56, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Should be" and "would like to" are not needs. If you work for this center, you need to read about conflict of interest and paid editing and make the required declarations. 331dot (talk) 11:01, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
331dot, No I don't work there, I am a normal contributor on Wikipedia. And sorry I cant take the paid service. Anyhow could you help me in this creation?

13:20:05, 10 September 2020 review of submission by 87.71.145.101[edit]


87.71.145.101 (talk) 13:20, 10 September 2020 (UTC) I've proof-read the entire article once again just to make sure everything goes smoothly and added references to the gambling commissions pages confirming the information about Jackpot.com licenses, and also to Jackpot.com T&C's page to confirm the products offered.[reply]

The draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 13:40, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've proof-read the entire article once again just to make sure everything goes smoothly and added references to the gambling commissions pages confirming the information about Jackpot.com licenses, and also to Jackpot.com T&C's page to confirm the products offered.

IutaJack (talk) 13:37, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IutaJack I assume you made the above post. 331dot (talk) 13:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14:32:43, 10 September 2020 review of submission by Oeakwari[edit]

Dear Sir or Madam: DGG rejected my submission. I asked to be pointed to wording he found objectionable. He responded with a summary description of the piece as promotional. He said I did not indicate any conflict of interest. From the beginning, I indicated my conflict. I would be grateful for one or two examples of what is unacceptable. I am confident that I can tailor the piece to conform to your standards. Thank you Oeakwari (talk) 14:32, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oeakwari, if your submission was rejected, then it will be not considered any further. You shoukd take a look at WP:PROMO to see our guidelines on promotion. Eternal Shadow Talk 14:45, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oeakwari (talk) 14:32, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

15:03:22, 10 September 2020 review of submission by Yazid.khemri[edit]


Hello I recently submitted an article for creation under the title 'El Houma', which has been accepted and created (and assessed as Start-Class). However, when I type the word 'El Houma' on google, I can not find the page

I was wondering why the page/article has not been put online yet Kind regards

Yazid.khemri (talk) 15:03, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Yazid.khemri: It is live, Google yust hasn't come to index the article. Please be patient. Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:53, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

15:16:13, 10 September 2020 review of submission by Superhima[edit]

Hi, Draft page was rejected. I work as a volunteer for Ocean Blue Project and need suggestions to publish this page for a non-profit organization. Can you please mention the errors in the page for rejection.

Thanks

Superhima (talk) 15:16, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Superhima Please review the conflict of interest and paid editing policies and make the required declarations. The latter is a Terms of Use requirement; you are still a "paid editor" even if you are an unpaid volunteer, as you are compensated with the experience of the volunteer work.
The draft just tells about the organization and what it does. Wikipedia articles must do more, they must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the organization, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable organization. "Significant coverage" goes beyond brief mentions, press releases, routine announcements, directory listings, or other primary sources. Please read Your First Article for more information. 331dot (talk) 16:12, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
331dot Thanks for the clarification Superhima (talk) 20:33, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

15:22:16, 10 September 2020 review of submission by Feking83[edit]

I am writing about an youtuber/idol agency. The article was declined due to unreliable source but the two sections briefly talking about its history and recent controversies all have proper source. What kind source can I added to make the article source reliable.
Another question about press release. In the case of this article where I use PR to confirm that "yes, we have this member with this name" or "yes, we have this event/album/appearance on this date". Is this bad or redundant or should I not include those detail at all. Feking83 (talk) 15:22, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Links to PR firms to confirm that YouTuber xxx is a member of that firm should be acceptable, but only for that (other editors may have a different opinion). Most social networks, including Twitter and Youtube rent considered reliable. Directory entries arent WP:SIGCOV. Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:51, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

17:07:34, 10 September 2020 review of draft by Gieldutoit[edit]


1.Dr Claassen passed away 30 years ago and that was why I struggled to get internet references. 2. I am afraid his discovery of :"How to learn much faster" might be lost to the world, so I appeal to you to help me here to allow this submission. 3. The 3 references I gave are actually 3 books published 40years ago. 3.a. The 1st reference is actually a book in a library with ISBN number: ISBN 0-620-03994-9.1979. This is a 1st class reference of a book where hundreds of thousands were printed and sold. 3.b. The 2nd reference is also a book in Cape Town , called Dianoetic methodology.1972 3.c. The 3rd reference is also a book in SA National Library: Claassen, J.P.D (1983). Dianoetic Learning Program.

4. His research is about to be obliterated and is a very important discovery, which I feel must not be lost to the world. (I personally has the 2nd and 3rd books in my house library and can give you some .JPG pictures if needed) Even if you can help me list it under another Wikipedia heading, this will also be greatly appreciated.

Gieldutoit (talk) 17:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

21:37:36, 10 September 2020 review of submission by Funsexhub[edit]


Funsexhub (talk) 21:37, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


21:41:55, 10 September 2020 review of draft by Jerome "Jerry" Fuller[edit]


Would you be able to help me get this article approved? I am new to this and am op en to any and all suggestions. Thank you!


Jerome "Jerry" Fuller (talk) 21:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 21:42:36, 10 September 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Anonymous 1908[edit]



Anonymous 1908 (talk) 21:42, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anonymous 1908, the article does not demonstrate that the subject is notable. Notability needs to be established by the subject having significant coverage in reliable sources. At the moment the only sources on the article are google searches (which have no value as a source), and the subject's own profiles on Spotify and Pinterest, which are not independent of the source and so can't establish notability. Perhaps read over Wikipedia:Notability (music) for wikipedia's notability guideline for musicians. Pi (Talk to me!) 00:01, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

22:26:09, 10 September 2020 review of submission by Bcmonroe[edit]


Hello, requesting a re-review because this initial submission was made in error. This should've stayed in draft mode. The idea is creating something similar to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_Dew_Amp and go into deeper detail about beverage brand as others have done. If this is against the rules, I understand.

Bcmonroe (talk) 22:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bcmonroe, a significant problem with the article is that the tone is overly-promotional. "With ten delicious flavors containing zero sugar, sodium, carbs, and calories, C4 Energy offers a better-for-you way to overachieve and outperform on a daily basis." reads like an advertisement, not an encyclopedia article Pi (Talk to me!) 23:56, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2020_September_10&oldid=985276102"