Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 July 6

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< July 5 << Jun | July | Aug >> July 7 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


July 6[edit]

12:54:15, 6 July 2022 review of submission by MuradAhmed786[edit]


MuradAhmed786 (talk) 12:54, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MuradAhmed786: You don't ask a question, but the draft has been rejected which means it will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not a host for personal webpages – Wikipedia articles should be about notable topics, and must be based on what independent and reliable sources say about the topic. --bonadea contributions talk 15:57, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

13:29:56, 6 July 2022 review of submission by Jamshedchhapra[edit]

I request a review of my submission since it is not intended for promotion only, the intentions are to provide valuable information about the company, its services, and products. Since I believe that it is really beneficial for those WIKIPEDIA users who like to refer to Wikipedia for collecting maximum information about any company. Either they wish to apply for a job or create a thesis on Information Technology Companies.

The proof that the intentions are not to solely promote the company is that I have not given any backlinks to the products or services pages of both of the websites of Absolute Solutions.

The Content I have compiled is for information purposes, and I will be really grateful if you like to point out the content I should remove or edit to get this wiki page approved.

This is my first submission to WIKIPEDIA and I am looking forward to improving my writing and submissions with your guidance. I have followed an earlier Wikipedia page of an IT Company Nitro Security.

Thanks for your guidance and support Jamshed Chhapra --Jamshedchhapra (talk) 13:29, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft has already been reviewed and rejected, it is blatant advertising and totally inappropriate for an encyclopedia and will soon be deleted. Theroadislong (talk) 13:34, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14:18:35, 6 July 2022 review of submission by Patatric[edit]

The draft submitted before was incomplete. Current achievements have been included in this draft. Patatric (talk) 14:18, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Patatric: Unfortunately the article has been rejected, which means it will not be considered again. But for future reference, you'll want to read WP:YOURFIRSTARTICLE. The main issue is lack of independent reliable sources demonstrating notability. I googled her and found this, this and this but they are not great sources. I'm not familiar with the Indian press, but there does not seem to be enough independent third party coverage to meet our notability guidelines. TechnoTalk (talk) 01:14, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
I understand your concern and I'm sorry for not citing more reliable sources at first. The 3 references you mentioned are third party news sources which covered the news after it was announced by the government of India.
Please follow the following links fro the official sites of government of India (1 and 2 from mygov.in and digital India official YouTube site. Number 3 from government of India site and 4 from a nationally renowned news site of India)
1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_j1xoWtMBs
2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rE_lKv5LOnc
3. https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=1792136
4. https://www.ndtv.com/education/29-children-win-pradhan-mantri-rashtriya-bal-puraskar-2022-heres-list
Please reconsider based on the information provided. Patatric (talk) 01:24, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Patatric: Government websites are useless for notability as they are primary sources. If news outlets haven't cared enough to actually discuss her at length outside of standard notices then we can't have an article on her. Your sources are good for proving she exists, but we are not looking for proof of existence. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 04:20, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

17:56:13, 6 July 2022 review of submission by MusicWizard7[edit]

AFC submission was declined for inadequate reliable sources. There are 6 references, including from Billboard Charts, two major newspapers, and the musician's official biography. What else do I need to add to make it adequate? MusicWizard7 (talk) 17:56, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

His own website and Facebook are not suitable sources though. Theroadislong (talk) 18:15, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@MusicWizard7: The Holland Sentinel source is the only one that has biographical information about him. The last item is a press release, which is considered a primary source controlled by the subject, and unfortunately therefore doesn't show notability. I think you should read Wikipedia:Notability (music), the notability requirements for musicians. TechnoTalk (talk) 01:03, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 18:59:08, 6 July 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by 102.219.153.86[edit]


My article was declined

102.219.153.86 (talk) 18:59, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We are not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. Each claim the draft makes that could potentially be challenged for any reason what-so-ever MUST be cited to an in-depth, non-routine, independent source written by an identifiable author/journalist and subjected to standard editorial fact-checking processes that corroborates the claim or (if no such sources can be found) removed wholesale. This is a hard requirement when writing about living or recently-departed people on Wikipedia and is NOT NEGOTIABLE. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 19:14, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@102.219.153.86: There are numerous issues with the draft. The main one is that there are no good inline citations to support the information you are drafting. It's too hard for us to tell if the subject is notable. You should take a close look at Help:Referencing for beginners to learn how to properly add inline citations. Also, there is too much detail for a reviewer to review. I recommend that you work from the sources and write the article only with info that is in the sources, rather than writing it and then trying to find sources for the info. Instead of a long list of books, perhaps identify a few that have reviews, and use those reviews to source the books. You can always add more info later. It's a lot to read, but WP:YFA has some good info as well. TechnoTalk (talk) 00:55, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

20:24:36, 6 July 2022 review of draft by Miriner[edit]


Miriner (talk) 20:24, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Can you please clarify for me the status of my submission? My latest draft was reviewed and a comment was made that the subject seems noteworthy, but there were some footnote issues that the reviewer was going to work on. I also see that a different reviewer has made some changes. Is the article ready for publication?

I also found that my article was published on Everybody Wiki, which surprised me.

Can you please let me know if there is something I should be working on now to change or update the article?

Thanks very much.

Miriner

YouTube, Linkedin.com and Wikipedia are not reliable sources, they need removing/replacing. Theroadislong (talk) 21:18, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2022_July_6&oldid=1097684147"