Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Singapore/2016 archive

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

FOSS Asia

FOSS Asia 2016 (Free and Open Source Software Asia) will be held from March 18-20 in the Singapore Science Center. Local volunteer Luther asked if anyone from wikimedia Singapore would like to give a talk, or is interested in possibly collocating a meetup? If so, please contact contact@fossasia.org. Francis Bond (talk) 11:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Yale-NUS College

There is already a discussion taking place at Talk:Yale-NUS College, so there is no point discussing the matter in two places. Please join that discussion. — SMUconlaw (talk) 18:37, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hi I would appreciate if neutral editors can have a look at some bad faith edits and reverts going on here: These include

- removing properly sourced contents by many editors over time without discussion

- inserting misleading statements not found in the citations

- inappropriate tagging

- possible canvassing ?

- New user with tagging knowledge? Special:Contributions/Josephine768

This has gone on for some time and your opinions needed. Also see Talk:Yale-NUS College. Thank you Baxter.melb (talk) 05:39, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

@Baxter.melb:, could you please provide some diffs of the "bad faith" edits? On Wikipedia we tend to backup accusations with diffs (as evidence), so I would like you to provide those. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:47, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Wp:BRDC is "not for reverting changes by different editors repeatedly over an extended period to protect your preferred version or ideas". - for one. State your reasons in Talk for each paragraph. Wait for community consensus Baxter.melb (talk) 06:12, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

I don't see any "bad faith" tagging btw. In particular, this seems to be a legitimate reason to tag (and I see another editor had previously reverted you). We tend to assume good faith. I for example, am assuming good faith with you, although it is quite obvious that you may have a conflict of interest and that you don't seem to be a new user either. You have been reverted by multiple editors - me, Julietdeltalima and Drmies. I suggest you come to the talk page and discuss. Maintenance templates are not supposed to be removed until the problems have been fixed. I saw that Drmies actually fixed some of the problems, but you on the other hand added them back and also removed the template.--Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:33, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

FWIW, "new user with tagging knowledge" applies to Baxter.melb as well. Drmies (talk) 14:35, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

JJ Lin

Article has been merged into the main JJ Lin article. — SMUconlaw (talk) 15:13, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

album repeatedly blanked shouldn't this be an AFD discussion? In ictu oculi (talk) 16:18, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

... Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waiting for Love (JJ Lin album). --John Vandenberg ^(chat) 10:11, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singapore Tamils

Please see this relevant AFD. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singapore Tamils. Thank you. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:38, 12 December 2016 (UTC)