Talk:1889 Apia cyclone

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

NPOV[edit]

The article has several spots of POV, for example: were very keen to exploit the situation in order to expand their holdings in the Pacific... the result was a catastrophe... etc., just clean it up a little, and it could be a very good article... - Adolphus79 10:38, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alas, [the result] of this comment is tht the then enthusiastic and hyperbolic text was toned down but not corrected. It now gives a wholly misleading impression, of straightforward (though unsourced) fact. In reality it is largely free speculation (at best OR). 2A04:B2C2:405:EB00:5529:18FB:276F:1A8B (talk) 22:19, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Todo[edit]

Inline sourcing. Hurricanehink (talk) 19:41, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And correct organization. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 18:02, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1889 Apia cyclone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:48, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]