This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belarus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belarus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelarusWikipedia:WikiProject BelarusTemplate:WikiProject BelarusBelarus articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Oppose per nom rationale. Our WP:TITLES policy is to name topics based on their WP:COMMONNAME in English sources. We don't prescriptive rename simply to match other articles in a category. -- Netoholic@ 20:59, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I’m quite new to this. Having read that policy, I also say that "Ministry of Defence" is used on their official website. It is also used on their Government website, and even the lead of the article has been using "Ministry of Defence" rather than "Defence Ministry" since October 2017. The majority of the articles in Category:Government ministries of Belarus also use the format "Ministry of Foo (Belarus). Sildemund (talk) 21:39, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Changing to Support. While WP:OFFICIALNAMES are not always the COMMMONNAME we use for titling, in this case reliable secondary sources (news mostly) seem mixed between "Ministry of Defense" and "Defense Ministry". Going support mainly to be WP:CONSISTENT with other Belarus ministry articles, and acknowledging that option does match the official website. -- Netoholic@ 16:51, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.