Talk:Rocky De La Fuente political campaign

Requested move 27 October 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: MOVED to Rocky De La Fuente presidential campaign, 2016. (non-admin closure) Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 04:18, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rocky De La Fuente political campaign → Rocky De La Fuente presidential campaign, 2016 – for consistency with other candidate campaign page links; to distinguish year – Bcharles (talk) 09:03, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. @Bcharles: At the present time, this article lists a presidential campaign and a senate campaign. The proposed title doesn't match the current scope of the article. Steel1943 (talk) 13:46, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Steel1943: The Senate campaign was nominal and could be viewed as part of the presidential campaign strategy. It could also be removed, refocusing on the presidential race, as the brief section is verbatim from the candidate's page. Bcharles (talk) 13:55, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support refocusing and standardizing to match other presidential campaigns. I know of no US Senate campaigns that have their own pages, especially not ones which did not even win their party's primary. His presidential campaign, on the other hand, is notable and needs a separate article.--TM 18:13, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion has been closed for over a week, with 2 Support votes and one Comment that looks more like an Oppose. However, the person who posted the latter response declined to defend his statements after they were challenged. I Support the proposed move, making the results 3-(1), depending on whether one counts the Comment as an Oppose vote or not. As such, I am moving the page. Display name 99 (talk) 18:19, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Forget it. It will not work. Display name 99 (talk) 18:24, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Display name 99: it should be moved soon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 04:18, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Heads-up, I manually moved the article in accordance with the resolution reached in the above discussion. SecretName101 (talk) 06:32, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]