User talk:Yhyhyhyhy

February 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Sergia Galván Ortega—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 07:48, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can I paraphrase though? Yhyhyhyhy (talk) 05:15, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Yhyhyhyhy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. —chaetodipus (talk) 12:33, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IDC Yhyhyhyhy (talk) 09:26, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. This is absolutely unacceptable. It doesn't matter if you don't care. Wikipedia cares and has a policy against it. Do not do this again. Whpq (talk) 18:13, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello Yhyhyhyhy! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —chaetodipus (talk) 08:15, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: History of Jews in Arizona (February 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:History of Jews in Arizona and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 05:24, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yhyhyhyhy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 05:24, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:History of Jews in Arizona[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:History of Jews in Arizona requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/arizona-jewish-history. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. bonadea contributions talk 05:41, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Broken Raven[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Broken Raven requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.brilliant-books.net/book/9781536207484. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk) 14:09, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted text[edit]

Despite previous warning about copying copyrighted text, you have persisted in doing so in creating Draft:Broken Raven. Copyright violations are not acceptable. Do this again and you will be blocked from editing. -- Whpq (talk) 16:51, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Giulia Petracco Sicardi moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Giulia Petracco Sicardi, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. Don't cite Wikipedia within itself. WP:CIRCULAR Silikonz💬 13:45, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Giulia Petracco Sicardi (February 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Giulia Petracco Sicardi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:33, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Deborah Carlos Valencia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deborah Carlos Valencia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deborah Carlos Valencia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mozzcircuit (talk) 12:02, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Melissa Network moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Melissa Network, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Razer(talk) 12:02, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pinky Aquino-Abellada[edit]

Hello Yhyhyhyhy,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pinky Aquino-Abellada for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 07:38, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Raydann What is promotional about my article?

l Yhyhyhyhy (talk) 08:04, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chiho Kanzaki moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Chiho Kanzaki, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 12:11, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chiho Kanzaki (February 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Very close paraphrasing of sources, together with unsourced information.

Not cohesive – reads like three or four promotional blurbs with no linking between them; the promotional tone alone would be grounds for declining.

Fluff such as "her favourite breakfast is" and "the secret she'd most like to know" have no place in an encyclopaedia. Not even if they had had a source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chiho Kanzaki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 10:30, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Luanda Formation moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Luanda Formation, is not suitable as written to remain published. Almost none of it had anything to do with Luanda Formation. It looks like you simply copied random sentences containing the words "Luanda" and/or "formation" from random sources, and pasted them into the article. That's unacceptable.

Wikipedia can't be used as a source, and neither can other user generated sources such as mindat.org. bonadea contributions talk 10:40, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zentangle moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Zentangle, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 10:47, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sharon Jeffrey Lehrer moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Sharon Jeffrey Lehrer, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 11:00, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page.

You have been asked to stop using Wikipedia as a source. You have been informed (more than once) about the importance of not adding copyright violating text to Wikipedia. But you are still doing these things.

I also have to ask what made you create this article. If you create an article about a geological landscape feature, why include a bunch of text that is completely unconnected to that feature? Did you Google for the words "Luanda" and "formation" and add anything that came up in the search? The same question applies to this biography – the "Awards" section had nothing to do with the article's subject Sharon Jeffrey Lehrer, instead it talked about another person called Sharon and yet another person called Jim Lehrer. Not to mention the fact that half the last section in that article was a copy of the first section. --bonadea contributions talk 11:10, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What the? Yhyhyhyhy (talk) 12:19, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No I didn't google it also It says Conclusion Yhyhyhyhy (talk) 12:20, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why did I even log in here? Bye bye Yhyhyhyhy (talk) 12:24, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pinky Aquino-Abellada moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Pinky Aquino-Abellada, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 16:19, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Giulia Petracco Sicardi (February 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Immediately resubmitted without any changes following the previous decline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Giulia Petracco Sicardi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 16:27, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Chiho Kanzaki has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Chiho Kanzaki. Thanks! Valereee (talk) 18:21, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Luanda Formation[edit]

Hello, Yhyhyhyhy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Luanda Formation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.